Cart
0
An Army Veteran Spent 30 Days in Jail After Flock Cameras Placed His Car Near a Shooting
An Army veteran and doctoral student spent 30 days in a Georgia jail after investigators connected his vehicle to a road-rage shooting. The charges were later dismissed with prejudice, and he is now suing the City of Atlanta over his arrest.
Courtesy photos of Ladavious Dashawn McNair
Ladavious Dashawn McNair was arrested on October 2, 2024, nearly a year after a November 2023 road-rage shooting in southwest Atlanta. Police accused him of pistol-whipping a man and shooting him in the knee after a traffic dispute. McNair denied being the shooter.
Investigators had evidence placing McNair's vehicle in the area around the time of the shooting. Atlanta police said Flock camera data picked up his vehicle, while court records also show investigators said his cellphone was near the location. That evidence helped lead authorities to McNair.
Gear Spotlight- What Our Readers Are Picking Up
But there was a problem with what the cameras could actually establish.
McNair's attorney said he was driving through the area because he was on his way to Clark Atlanta University, where he was pursuing his PhD. She said McNair was in class when the shooting occurred and that a professor and students could support his account. An affidavit from a professor was later included among exhibits filed in McNair's federal lawsuit.
The identification evidence also changed.
According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the shooting victim did not identify McNair during an initial photo lineup in November 2023. Months later, the victim encountered McNair's name in a police report, searched for him on Facebook and subsequently identified him in another photo lineup.
McNair was then arrested and transferred to the Fulton County Jail, where he remained for about 30 days.
On November 1, 2024, the Fulton County District Attorney's Office asked the judge not to prosecute the case. The state's motion said it no longer believed it could prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt because the victim's certainty about identifying McNair as the shooter had changed. Judge Kimberly M. Esmond Adams dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning the charges could not simply be brought again.
The judge also criticized the handling of the case, calling it āegregiousā and saying prosecutors had evidence raising serious questions about McNair's guilt.
The dispute did not end with the dismissal.
On September 2, 2025, McNair filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit against the City of Atlanta, Police Chief Darin Schierbaum and detective Abdul R. Mustapha. The case, McNair v. City of Atlanta, is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
His lawsuit has now brought renewed attention to the role of automated license-plate surveillance. McNair's attorney argues that the technology could show where a vehicle was detected, but not who was driving it. His legal team has also questioned whether investigators relied too heavily on vehicle-location data while pursuing him.
The case is still unresolved in federal court, and the docket shows that Atlanta filed a motion seeking dismissal of McNair's civil complaint in October 2025. Subsequent filings show the litigation continued into 2026.
The case now raises a question extending beyond one Atlanta arrest: when surveillance technology places a person's vehicle near a crime, how much should that information count as evidence of the person's presence?
Editorās Note: McNair's criminal case was dismissed with prejudice, but that dismissal was not a judicial finding that Flock technology itself caused his arrest or that every allegation in his civil lawsuit is true. Police also cited cellphone-location evidence, while McNair's attorney has disputed the identification and emphasized his claimed presence at Clark Atlanta University. His federal civil-rights lawsuit remains pending, so the allegations against the city and police have not been finally adjudicated.
