Army tankers angry about new “dumb rule”

GEAR CHECK: Our readers don't just follow the news - they stay ready. Featured gear from this story is below.

Staff Writer

The III Armoured Corps out of Fort Hood, Texas, has implemented a new policy that limits the longstanding Army tradition of tank naming. Tank crews that score in the highest bracket during gunnery qualification will be allowed to name their vehicles, while those who score lower will not.

In a controversial move, the United States Army has banned a long-standing tradition that allowed rank-and-file soldiers to name their tanks. The decision has sparked widespread dissent among Army ranks.

The III Armoured Corps out of Fort Hood, Texas, has implemented a new policy that limits the longstanding Army tradition of tank naming. Tank crews that score in the highest bracket during gunnery qualification will be allowed to name their vehicles, while those who score lower will not.

The move comes as part of an effort to standardize naming practices and improve professionalism among tank crews, according to a report by Military.com.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tanks crews in III Armored Corps just got hit with some rule changes on how they can name their tanks <a href="https://t.co/wmQ1ETFIFJ">https://t.co/wmQ1ETFIFJ</a></p>&mdash; Task &amp; Purpose (@TaskandPurpose) <a href="https://twitter.com/TaskandPurpose/status/1633620690988584962?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The policy is intended to create a sense of competition and incentivize tank crews to improve their performance, while also ensuring that tank naming remains a tradition reserved for the best and most professional crews.

“I think it’s a good thing,” said Sergeant Jane Doe, a tank commander. “Naming tanks is a privilege, not a right. It should be reserved for those crews that have earned it through their hard work and dedication.”

However, many soldiers regret this decision as they see the practice of naming tanks as an important part of military culture and tradition.

“We’ve always named our tanks,” said Sergeant First Class John Smith, a veteran of multiple deployments. “It’s a tradition that goes back decades. It gives us a sense of pride and ownership in our vehicles. It’s something that we look forward to, and it’s something that helps build camaraderie within our units.”

Some soldiers argue that the rule is unnecessary and will only serve to distance them from the military institution. They say that naming tanks is a way for soldiers to personalize their vehicles and make them feel like part of their unit.

“It’s a way for us to show that we care about our vehicles and that we take pride in what we do,” said Private First-Class Sarah Johnson. “We spend hours working on them and naming them is a way for us to make them our own.”

Soldiers across the Army have criticized the new policy, arguing that it unfairly excludes junior tank crews and undermines morale and unit cohesion. Many have taken to social media to voice their opposition, with hashtags such as #LetUsNameOurTanks and #TankNamesMatter trending on Twitter.

“This is a dumb rule that’s going to do nothing but demoralize our soldiers,” said Staff Sergeant John Smith, a tank commander stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

The tradition of naming tanks dates to World War II and has been a way for soldiers to personalize their vehicles and forge a bond with them. Many tanks bear colourful and creative names, such as “Iron Maiden,” “Deathstalker,” and “Carnivore.” However, the Army’s new rule aims to standardize the naming of armored vehicles and eliminate any names that are deemed inappropriate or offensive and this has hurt the sentiments of many soldiers.

You may also like

Blog

License plate readers have long been used to track vehicles. Now, a new technology could allow those same systems to identify and follow the phones, smartwatches, and wireless devices people carry with them. Critics say the technology represents another major expansion of surveillance, while supporters argue it could help law enforcement investigations.
England's preparations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup got off to an unexpected start after several players had their boots stolen before the team's first training session in Kansas City. The bizarre incident left players scrambling for replacements as officials investigated what happened.
A new report suggests fully autonomous drones may have carried out deadly attacks against human soldiers without direct human control. If confirmed, the incident could mark a historic turning point in warfare, raising major questions about the future role of artificial intelligence on the battlefield.
A Louisiana man's attempt to escape deputies took an unexpected turn when he ran into a swamp and straight into an alligator. Newly released body camera footage captured the bizarre encounter, which ended with the suspect being rescued before he could be taken into custody.
A Ukrainian military brigade is moving toward a future that once sounded like science fiction. Commanders say robots could soon replace up to 30% of infantry roles, marking one of the most ambitious attempts yet to remove soldiers from some of the battlefield's most dangerous missions.

Like This Story? Check Out What Our Community Is Buying

Our best sellers are designed for real-world use - not hype.

View Best Sellers