FBI Admits Buying Americans’ Location Data

GEAR CHECK: Our readers don't just follow the news - they stay ready. Featured gear from this story is below.

Staff Writer

The Federal Bureau of Investigation acknowledged purchasing Americans’ location data, prompting criticism from Ron Wyden and renewed concerns over privacy and constitutional protections.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has confirmed it is purchasing location data tied to Americans, with Director Kash Patel making the statement under oath during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on global threats on Wednesday, reigniting concerns over surveillance and individual privacy.

The disclosure came during an exchange with Ron Wyden, a Democrat who has consistently opposed warrantless data collection. Wyden pointed to earlier testimony from former FBI Director Christopher Wray, who told lawmakers in 2023 that the bureau was not then purchasing location data derived from digital advertising, though it had done so previously.

Seeking clarification, Wyden asked whether that position had changed and whether the FBI would commit to refraining from such purchases.

Patel replied that the agency acquires “commercially available information” in line with constitutional requirements and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, adding that the data has been useful in generating intelligence.

Wyden interpreted the response as confirmation that the FBI is currently buying Americans’ location data, warning that doing so without a warrant circumvents protections under the Fourth Amendment. He also raised concerns about how artificial intelligence could be used to process large volumes of personal data, intensifying the risks.

The senator reiterated support for the proposed Government Surveillance Reform Act, bipartisan legislation intended to curb such practices and address what critics describe as gaps in existing oversight.

Although authorities must obtain a warrant to collect location data directly from telecommunications providers, they are able to access similar information by purchasing it from private data brokers, creating a legal workaround.

The issue drew additional attention after Warren Davidson, a Republican lawmaker, echoed Wyden’s concerns online and promoted parallel legislation in the House, co-sponsored with Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren.

Davidson argued that the practice undermines constitutional protections and stressed the need to eliminate the data broker loophole that allows agencies to obtain sensitive personal information without judicial approval.

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, requiring that warrants be issued only with probable cause and clear specification of what is to be searched or seized.

Editor’s Note:

This article is based on sworn testimony by Kash Patel before the Senate Intelligence Committee regarding data practices by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Concerns raised by Ron Wyden and others highlight ongoing legal and constitutional debates, particularly surrounding the interpretation of the Fourth Amendment and the use of commercially available data obtained through third-party brokers.

You may also like

Blog

A routine campaign stops at an Ohio county fair suddenly turned into a security emergency when an armed man allegedly forced his way through a crowd and charged toward Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton.
The U.S.-Iran war entered a dangerous new phase on September 5 when Iran fired ballistic missiles at two American warships, prompting the United States to strike three Iranian oil tankers in a rapid military and economic retaliation.
A new dark-web marketplace may have exposed the identities of more than 153 million people across the United States and Canada, with hackers reportedly offering digital copies of government-issued IDs for sale.
A wedding celebration in southern Iran turned deadly on September 1 after a U.S. strike reportedly sent missile fragments into a home where dozens of people had gathered, killing at least five people and injuring more than 60.
A 22-year-old college student went to the wrong house in the middle of the night. Minutes later, he was dead after being shot twice by a police officer who had responded to a 911 call about a possible break-in.

Like This Story? Check Out What Our Community Is Buying

Our best sellers are designed for real-world use - not hype.

View Best Sellers